About The Results of psychological assessment

When a psychological assessment is properly carried out?

From a technical standpoint expertise is appropriate when the opinion has probative value, which is estimated by the judge taking into account the competence of the expert, scientific or technical principles on which it is, the matching of your application with the rules of sound criticism, observations by technical consultants or lawyers, and other items of evidence that the reason offered.

From a practical standpoint, a skill or an evaluation by a technical consultant is appropriate if overall result is a diagnosis and percentage of disability is consistent with the fact litis reason.

When an expert says in an opinion that a particular harmful event has not produced any psychological sequelae in the experts, or when he attributes the entire observable symptoms to a preexisting condition, all suspect that something is not right.

From here there is little time for the lawyers to submit a request for explanations and this will make it even more difficult to achieve the designation of a new expert and a new opinion. The proof was produced, the unfavorable results, not much else to do.

It is not possible to know exactly what results would have been correct, but it is possible to speculate in terms of generalities.

In a traffic accident or other traumatic event, you typically would have been one of the anxiety disorders, namely post-traumatic stress disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, anxiety disorder not otherwise specified, and so on.

Course is usually chronic, and gravity will be moderate, and this means a permanent partial disability of approximately 20-25% of VTO, as well as a suggested treatment for two years at a rate of two interviews per week at a rate 80 pesos each with a median professional experience and reputation.

The existence of a preliminary report on the record opens the eyes of the expert appointed by the court, and typically do not deviate too much from the results already in the cause at the time of examination.

The presence of a technical consultant for the evaluation by the expert acts as the incentive to do well, being attentive to details, ask what perhaps in another situation might overlook.

Only lawyers and assistants to a lesser extent we play in the different specialties in the legal field know how much time and effort required to get from the demand to sentencing, a long journey in which each test to ensure as much as possible provides the peace of mind that you have used all resources to the client and yourself.